Test of the FlashFREEZE unit in tissue samples freezing for biobanking purposes.

Availability of molecularly intact biospecimens is essential in genetic diagnostics to obtain credible results. Integrity of nucleic acids (particularly RNA) may be compromised at various steps of tissue handling, and affected by factors such as time to freeze, freezing technique and storing temperature. At the same time, freezing and storing of the biological material should be feasible and safe for the operator. Here, we compared quality of DNA and RNA from biospecimens derived from different organs (breast, colon, adrenal glands, testes, rectum and uterus) frozen either using dry ice-cooled isopentane or with FlashFREEZE unit, in order to verify if the latter is suitable for routine use in biobanking. Implementing FlashFREEZE device would enable us to limit the use of isopentane, which is potentially toxic and environmentally harmful, whilst facilitate standardization of sample freezing time. We considered factors such RNA and DNA yield and purity. Furthermore, RNA integrity and RNA/DNA performance in routine analyses, such as qPCR, next generation sequencing or microarray, were also assessed. Our results indicate that freezing of tissue samples either with FlashFREEZE unit or isopentane ensures biological material with comparable expression profiles and DNA mutation status, indicating that RNA and DNA of similar quality can be extracted from both. Therefore, our findings support the use of the FlashFREEZE device in routine use for biobanking purposes.

Potential Targeted Therapies in Ovarian Cancer.

BACKGROUND: We aimed to identify somatic pathogenic and likely pathogenic mutations using next-generation sequencing (NGS). The mutational findings were held against clinically well-described data to identify potential targeted therapies in Danish patients diagnosed with high-grade serous ovarian cancer (HGSC). METHODS: We characterized the mutational profile of 128 HGSC patients. Clinical data were obtained from the Danish Gynecological Database and tissue samples were collected through the Danish CancerBiobank. DNA was analyzed using NGS. RESULTS: 47 (37%) patients were platinum-sensitive, 32 (25%) partially platinum-sensitive, 35 (27%) platinum-resistant, and three (2%) platinum-refractory, while 11 (9%) patients did not receive chemotherapy. Overall, 27 (21%) had known druggable targets. Twelve (26%) platinum-sensitive patients had druggable targets for PARP inhibitors: one for tyrosine kinase inhibitors and one for immunotherapy treatment. Eight (25%) partially platinum-sensitive patients had druggable targets: seven were eligible for PARP inhibitors and one was potentially eligible for alpesilib and hormone therapy. Seven (20%) platinum-resistant patients had druggable targets: six (86%) were potentially eligible for PARP inhibitors, one for immunotherapy, and one for erdafitinib. CONCLUSIONS: PARP inhibitors are the most frequent potential targeted therapy in HGSC. However, other targeted therapies remain relevant for investigation according to our mutational findings.